Thank you all—contributors, commentators, and readers—for another great year in the Soup! This month marks PEA Soup's fifth "birthday" on the blogosphere, and because of all of you, it was clearly the best. Thank you!
To celebrate, we've introduced a new design theme—Lone Tree Green!—and we've added a list of our contributors' most recent books. Most importantly, we've put together a small "2008-2009 Yearbook" to highlight some of the noteworthy events that happened this year on the Soup, and, especially, events that happened to and for some of our contributors. If contributors or readers have any more good news to share, please feel free to add it in the comments section. So, thank you all again, and… drum roll please…
Continue reading "Happy Fifth Birthday!" »
Friday 3rd - Sunday 5th July 2009
University of Kent, UK
Sponsors: The Analysis Trust, The Mind Association, The University of Kent.
Speakers include: Jonathan Dancy, Daniel Elstein, Allan Gibbard, Edward Harcourt, Chris Hookway, Adrian Moore, Michael Smith, Alan Thomas, Pekka Vayrynen, and Nick Zangwill, as well as PEA Soup's very own Brad Cokelet, Simon Kirchin, Jussi Suikkanen and Eric Wiland!
Continue reading "Conference - THICK CONCEPTS" »
The first Annual Arizona Workshop on Normative Ethics will take place in Tucson, Arizona, at the Westward Look Resort on January 7-9, 2010. Keynote speakers will be Thomas E. Hill (UNC, Chapel Hill), Holly Smith (Rutgers), and Peter Railton (Michigan).
Those interested in presenting a paper at the workshop are invited to submit a 2-3 abstract (double-spaced) by June 1, 2009. Only one submission per person is permitted. Abstracts will be evaluated by a program committee and decisions made in early July.
Continue reading "Call for Abstracts" »
At the moment, I’m interested in imperfect duties and, in particular, the duty of beneficence, and I need some help tracking down the relevant literature with regard to two particular aspects of this duty. First, it seems to me that the duty of beneficence is not a duty to do x amount of good for others (where x is some percentage of the total amount of good that one could possibly do for others), but is instead a duty to dedicate y percent of one’s time and/or resources to helping others. If it were the former as opposed to the latter, then, a person who donates only to NPR (National Public Radio) would have to donate twenty times as much as a relevantly similar person who instead donates only to Oxfam if Oxfam does twenty times as much good for others as NPR does with the same quantity of donated monies. Now, surely, someone has made this point, but since I don’t know the literature that well, could you tell me who and where.
Continue reading "A Request for Help Regarding Imperfect Duties" »
Recent Comments