Some Of Our Books

Categories

« Moral Utterances, Nihilism and the Negation Problem | Main | Slaves of the Passions (Part I) »

November 07, 2008

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

One can only assume that the sensor is mounted at a convenient height for optimal use ... about 9 feet up the wall, I should think.

I suddenly noticed that the sign has a scope ambiguity. Which one makes a toxin puzzle?

1. Please try to (touch "No Touch" dispenser without touching it)

2. Please (try to touch "No Touch" dispenser without touching it)

To clarify: the first asks you to attempt something that is impossible; the second asks you to combine trying to touch with not touching.

Yeah, I noticed that too. I was thinking (2) was like the toxin puzzle. (2) also seems like the more charitable interpretation of the signmaker's intent (Simon Rippon's comment only makes sense if it's (2)). It seems like most of the commenters at failblog were reading it as (1), the uncharitable bastards. Both interpretations raise questions about the nature of trying and the connection between trying and doing, so either way, it's a cool sign.

It is a cool sign. My favourite is the paradoxical (is it a liar sentence?) sign in here:

http://my.opera.com/saysame/albums/showpic.dml?album=361896&picture=5197141

The comments to this entry are closed.

Ethics at PEA Soup

PPE at PEA Soup

Like PEA Soup

Search PEA Soup


Disclaimer

  • Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed in any given post reflect the opinion of only that individual who posted the particular entry or comment.